Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSquealer
No one has to. The prosecution has to prove Zimmerman started the fight. The prosecution has not even come remotely close to that.
You are saying Martin was defending himself. You know thats a losing argument not rooted in fact, so you then switch tactics and try to produce another argument which is irrelevant to your assertion that Martin was "defending himself" - which evidence does not support.
|
what fucking facts demonstrate martin started the fight? how do you claim martin was not defending himself? he was being followed & that is indisputable. you think its justified martin is dead because someone followed him & he decided to stand up for himself.
how is it possible the pursuer who was a gun is defending himself from the guy with skittles who is being chased.
mind boggling.