Quote:
Originally Posted by JoshGirls Josh
vdbacks. if martin was able to get zims gun, kill zim. do you then fight for martins self defense the way you blindly fight for zims?
did martin have a right to defend himself? did he have a right to live since he did nothing wrong & was packing skittles? do you even think about his rights at all?
i believe you need to justify your view that an innocent man who is dead did not have any crime committed against him, had no right to defend himself, had no right to live. thats exactly your position.
 |
I'm not fighting for zimmerman. If you bothered to read the thread then you would know where I stand. And I never once said I thought GZ is innocent, never even close to saying that.
And if Martin would have grabbed GZ's gun and killed him with it, it would be murder, given the rest of the facts of the case. Not to mention, it wouldn't be this media circus that it is now. The black community wouldn't be threatening violence and such nonsense because no one outside of that town would even know about the case. The entire thing is a huge media and political circle jerk. But that is a moot point because "what if" doesn't mean shit.
I am defending what is supposed to be the law, what we call "due process". Politics and outside groups like the media and black community shouldn't be having such a major impact on a murder trial, and yet they are. This entire incident has been spun as a racism fueled hate crime from the very start. And it makes me sick.