vdbacks. if martin was able to get zims gun, kill zim. do you then fight for martins self defense the way you blindly fight for zims?
did martin have a right to defend himself? did he have a right to live since he did nothing wrong & was packing skittles? do you even think about his rights at all?
i believe you need to justify your view that an innocent man who is dead did not have any crime committed against him, had no right to defend himself, had no right to live. thats exactly your position.
