Quote:
Originally Posted by JoshGirls Josh
the 64,000 dollar question is. if he gets convicted of anything that results in large time. will every poster in this thread, who insists the state has no case, admit they were wrong?
or will you insist the 6 jurors were all wrong & your still right.
 |
As I've said...I don't think from what I've seen, or the opinions of some of the most prominent attorneys in the world on CNN, that the state has proved anything "beyond a reasonable doubt".
But as I said earlier...what the jury will do is another thing.
If I were on that jury, I would be thinking about the repercussions of acquitting him. The possibility of riots and violence. Having that weigh on my head would probably make me find him guilty just out of intimidation and fear that other people could be killed because of my decision.
I think it's a crap shoot. 50/50
Any other case and I think the trial would have already been called off by the judge. The state didn't think they had enough of anything to charge him in the beginning if you remember. Which is why their case was so weak when they presented it in court.
But this one may be decided by the jury worrying about the aftermath.