Quote:
Originally Posted by vdbucks
I'm pretty sure an innocent man would heed the advice of his defense attorney. That is what they get paid for after all.
You can bet your last dollar that if GZ's attorney thought it would be beneficial to his defense, or that it was even remotely necessary, GZ would have testified.
|
correct. if he was factually innocent, GZs attorney would understand the danger of the holes in zims facts & would seek to rectify them with testimony. The truth tends to come out through the examination process. so any truly innocent person corrects the record & tells the jury directly that he was defending himself, & why.