Originally Posted by vdbucks

There don't need to be any facts that prove he is innocent. The facts need to prove he is guilty; and they do not.

The burden of proof is, and always has been, on the prosecution; not the defense.

Perhaps you and a few others should try educating yourselves a little...

And, since you clearly don't seem to be able to read, or are too lazy to, I've never once said I thought he was innocent.