View Single Post
Old 07-10-2013, 12:13 PM  
Jel
Confirmed User
 
Jel's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,904
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
And I don't see this at all. He started the confrontation by following him, and the only real injury he got was two cuts and a fat lip. At the same time somehow Zimmerman - who was loosing consciousness - was able to pull out his firearm while Martin was physically on top of him? Bullshit.

I think a confrontation took place, Martin sucker punched him, they wrestled a little bit, and then Zimmmerman shot him. This was a fist fight, Zimmerman was never in any danger, help was seconds away (seconds after Martin was shot people were on the scene), police were already en-route, and his injuries were not life threatening in any way shape or form.
Thank fuck you aren't on the jury then. Your verdict is based on what you think happened, rather than the evidence which PROVES Zimmerman WAS NOT acting in self defence. Where is that, btw? The thing that can prove Zimmerman was not in fear of his life at that moment in time the shot was fired?

How can someone who bends over so much for anything and everything the cops do, disregard the fact that by law the prosecution must PROVE Zimmerman had intent to kill? Oh wait, that's exactly how law enforcement and it's blinkered supporters works - my bad! The law MUST BE OBEYED...until it comes to dishing out 'justice', that is.
Jel is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote