Originally Posted by Rochard

Clearly someone with more balls than you.

And yet Martin, a seventeen year old kid, beat up an older armed man. Go figure.

Originally Posted by Rochard

I don't see you offering up a timeline skippy.

Originally Posted by Rochard

I'm sorry, I didn't clarify myself. What I really meant say was "I am not intentionally watching the trial nor do I have that kind of free time, however, I do watch bits here and there". I have watched the trial here and there. I've seen parts of the chick Martin was talking to when this all went down, one of the witnesses who saw the resulting scuffle, and the first police officer on the scene who arrested Zimmerman.

At the same time, I can read. I've read the defense's side, I've read the prosecution's side; I've read Zimmerman's statements. I've the police statements.



You are saying that his head was bashed on concrete, yet Zimmerman didn't need a doctor?

At the same time from the bond hearing one of the police officers stated he "questioned Zimmerman's statement that Martin was slamming his head against the sidewalk just before he shot the teenager, saying it was "not consistent with the evidence we found."





Again, I don't have the kind of free time have.



You ask the dumbest questions.

One would imagine that if someone had a firearm in their waistband it would stick out like a sore thumb, no? Maybe it was covered up under a jacket.

Then we have a statement from Zimmerman's father: "According to Zimmerman's father, during the struggle while Martin was on top of Zimmerman, Martin saw the gun his son was carrying"