Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
I am not 100% wrong; I didn't say there wasn't any witnesses, I said no one saw who started it. I don't care who was on top or who was beating who; All of this boils down to who started it. The only two people that know are Zimmerman and Martin, and one of them is dead.
Zimmerman has no defense. He can't claim "self defense" or "stand your ground"; He was the attacker. If I hit you over the head with a brick and you hit me back, I can't claim "self defense" if I shoot you. His injuries were also less than life threatening. At the same time you can't claim "stand your ground" AFTER you CHASED someone two blocks.
At the very least Zimmerman is guilty of manslaughter.
|
You say there were no witnesses and we don't know who started it.... then in the next paragraph you state as fact that Zimmerman was the attacker, when all evidence presented so far in court shows nothing like that. In fact all evidence so far in court, matches Zimmerman's account of what happened. From the injuries to the fact that Martin was on top pounding away.
Do you have evidence that Zimmerman then was the attacker? Because following a guy around while waiting for the police to show up is not "attacking." If there is some evidence or witness that I missed stating that Zimmerman started the attack, please let me know, as I have missed that part.