Quote:
Originally Posted by madm1k3
NO you clearly do have an opinion.
I stated Zimmerman ignored the 911 operator and you said I was twisting facts. You believe "Zimmermans version is he returned back to his car and he forgot what street he was on so he got back out to find a street sign, you believe that bullshit?" I don't, sounds pretty fucking made up. But then again so does half the shit in the prosecutor's argument.
But it doesn't matter what I think, or anyone besides the Jury thinks. If they believe Zimmerman started the confrontation by following Martin... he's guilty. If the jury believes the confrontation was started by Martin... he's innocent
This case is interesting to me not because of race but because of the definition of confrontation. If someone is following you and you confront them are you then the aggressor? Or is the act of following someone enough to consider the confrontation already started.
but I'm just a moron
|
Factually and legally incorrect. 1) He was not "ordered to do anything" (check the language used). 2) Anything the 911 operator tells him to do is 100% irrelevant. 911 dispatchers are not law enforcement. Regardless, the operator didn't order him to do anything as they are not in a position to do so.