View Single Post
Old 06-13-2013, 09:50 AM  
ReggieDurango
Confirmed User
 
ReggieDurango's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: California
Posts: 4,784
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruseful View Post
...but I'm sure right now, the legal expenses for 2257 fight fund would be the best fit. As that would be my vote right now...
JT, I obviously respect you very much in this industry and think you're a pioneer of the "new" porn industry. It is especially encouraging knowing that you STARTED in porn in tubes/free sites - and through the data that you acquired from that you believe in the viability of paysites today and moving forward - with proper advertising and samples clips on the tubes, etc.
That means that the pay side of the industry is NOT dead or killed by the tubes, but rather alive, well, and going to continue to grow much bigger.

Ok, back on topic, JT, if 2257 were to get repealed and the industry no longer had the requirement, what, then, would be the best way for us as an industry to ensure that we never shoot models under the age of 18???

Last edited by ReggieDurango; 06-13-2013 at 09:55 AM.. Reason: Without 2257 hanging over our heads as producers, what would really be blocking minors from slipping though and getting shot?
ReggieDurango is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote