View Single Post
Old 06-02-2013, 04:57 PM  
Walrus
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walrus View Post
Relying on dogsbite.org for information is like relying on some whacky right winger for news on politics.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo View Post
her facts matches wiki facts

her facts = the national canine research center's facts

the fact is pitbulls account for more dog bit fatalities than any other dog./
I was speaking of your chosen website of referring data from. I wasn't disputing the numbers she has compared with wikipedia. The problem with this is these statistics on dog bites and fatalities are skewed. That's because any dog that looks like a Pit bull will be labeled as a Pit bull. So even if a dog that was a Labrador/Pit/Chow but resembles a Pit bull they will write it down as a Pit bull.

It's funny that you should now refer to The National Canine Research Council. That website is the opposite of the other one... it is very reliable with accurate data. But you need to dig deeper into that site. Numbers don't mean a lot to me. Research does. Take a look at the Council's The Pit Bull Placebo. It's quite a long read, but is well worth it.
Walrus is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote