05-15-2013, 04:18 PM
|
|
The People's Post
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 65,728
|
richard, you're way past your 6 posts = trolling bullshit huh, apply your rule to yourself this time eh.
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Richard_
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Richard_
then, you get into 'top and bottom'
so, for the us, you have air craft carriers sailing around like they own the place
and then you have the 'bottoms', who just have to design something that takes out those carriers:
http://chuckmanwordsincomments.wordp...ican-hegemony/
these have been in theater for years.. it's amusing reading about how they 'negate' these missiles
the missiles costs are in the thousands, and they go so fast the only defense is sorties spot the supersonic missile, and your anti-missile systems shoot em down.. and that's extremely difficult to do, as they're programmed to just deal with US carriers
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Richard_
...
you can have 3 subs, at a total of 48 silos, at the same cost of 1 sub, with 24 silos
btw, does the US version come with a silent drive?
that's important stuff.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Richard_
what in the world would you have to gloat about?
you disputed the facts, and once basic math was introduced, you reverted to insulting me
now now.. before you post another 6 responses, i don't care.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Richard_
18 subs.. how many aircraft carriers?
ga no, go find someone else to agree with
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Richard_
2 billion price tag quotes a 1997 pricing sheet.. so looking at price increases for planes, missiles, etc.. the sub isn't 2 billion
the 'classified' shit i was reading pegged the sub at 2.85 billion, etc.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Richard_
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Richard_
the chance at paying for all of Russia' aging nuclear fleet to be disassembled.. in europe?
no that's crazy.. we'd never agree to that 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Richard_
those who ignore history and all that
|

|
|
|