Quote:
Originally Posted by Arnox
http://www.pcmag.com/article/print/264371
Monster cables are a complete myth. No evidence supports the hypothesis that they provide a better picture.
If you have any evidence to counter what I've offered, feel free to share it. Otherwise, educate yourself and stop spouting nonsense.
|
Learn to read before getting mouthy towards me, fuckhead.
I said:
Quote:
|
What causes grainy looking HD displays in stores is the split signals and the demos they set up with Monster cable that makes all non-monster setups look bad (purposely).
|
I did not say Monster was better or anything of the like. Monster typically demands that stores selling their products, PURPOSELY make non-monster cables give grainy and terrible signals. When I worked in retail, we had boxes that would split hdmi. One with monster, one with a cheapo brand. No matter which cable used, the non-monster labeled side of box always looked like shit. So they are misleading people into believing monster is better when it's the box making people think its better on the "monster" side.
I am not a supporter of, nor do I believe in Monster's absurb claims.
Another crazy fact.
Back when I was in this retail store, the store cost for a 6 foot cable is as follows:
Monster, $10.
Store brand, $10.
Retail price?
Monster, $50
Store brand, $20.
Same spec, same performance. Monster is a scam.