Quote:
Originally Posted by mikesinner
It's their business
|
It's the government's business when employees are discriminated against based on core concepts of the law (freedom of religion, sexuality, etc.). The government isn't free to force employment for trivial choices (for instance, not employing non-smokers is entirely legal, because smoking isn't covered as a protected quality by the government) but can and should stop companies from employing based on gender and age.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikesinner
and even if they were forced to except models in other categories they could set up their site so it looks like they aren't there and cut off a lot of their potential viewers.
|
If they want to engage in these tactics, that is something for the court to consider. However, MFC might have a legal requirement not to discriminate against Transgender individuals. I haven't spent enough time looking over the history of other cases, but I do know that both age and gender are heavily contested employment qualities that can land you in a lot of trouble for noncompliance.
My Free Cams is free to say "you can't work on this site because you're ugly", but legally, I don't think it's sound for them to say "you can't work on this site because you're transgender".
I guess during the week I'll head on up to my Uni's law library and clug out some thick dusty books. Personally, I just find the concept interesting, that's all.