Originally Posted by Rochard

So I'm watching this.... And what the fuck kind of bullshit is this?

12:45 some fuck tard is talking about "how people crossed from point a to point b past the thickest of the fire". He doesn't tell us where point a is or where point b is, or where the thickest of the fire was. Nor does he tell us which tower this was in or WHEN.

And this is most typical of this bullshit - no facts, let's just put doubt in your mind.

Maybe they crossed before the fire was thick there? Maybe they passed on the other side of the building where the fire wasn't as thick?

I'm just getting warmed up.

Originally Posted by Rochard

13:30: The temperture of the fire in the building was not particularly high as evidenced by this woman standing on the ledge.

Fucktards - it was so fucking hot people were fucking jumping out of windows that were 70 stories to escape the heat.

Originally Posted by Rochard

14:16: Someone from the Underwriters company was fired from his job because he didn't believe the report was correct.

You think? Everyone else at the company believed it, but only one person did not. He didn't get fired because he uncovered some secret conspiracy, but he got fired because he didn't agree with everyone else. No one else at the company got fired.

Originally Posted by Rochard

15:16: They (meaning the govenment) did tests on remaining samples that proved the tempertures were very low.

Great. We dont' know what the tempertures. There was jet fuel involved, that much is sure. But we didn't need to melt steel - all we needed to do was bend it enough until it snapped. Combined with the missing steel supports taken out... Bingo, building fell.

Surprise!

Originally Posted by Rochard

18:48: Dario Fo, NOBEL PRIZE WINNER, talks about WTC7. So clearly he's fucking qualified to speak the truth, RIGHT?

Because clearly the 1997 Nobel Prize in Literature is qualified to discussing engineering and buildings collapsing.

Originally Posted by Rochard

19:52: When WTC7 fell, how come it fell at freefall speeds?

Because it fell and when things fall straight they fall quickly?

Originally Posted by Rochard

20:10: Molten Metal?

There were fires that went on for weeks.... Why would this surprise anyone?

Originally Posted by Rochard

20:21: "There is molten metal that we have studied at length"....

Who studied it? Who is "we"?

I don't know what that is. Looks like something on fire dripping. Might be metal, might be copper wire.

Originally Posted by Rochard

21:01: The tempertures at the fire could have been only 800 degrees at the most.

Um, you said earlier "not partically hot". Which was it?

Originally Posted by Rochard

That was classic really. He's a nobel prize winner so he must be fucking smart, right?

Sure thing.

Originally Posted by Rochard

21:32: "We have detected a chemical that should not be there, sulfur."

Oh my god, that's it - proof positive. I mean, they found sulfur in the debris. I mean, it's not like they don't use sulfur in concrete, RIGHT?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sulfur_concrete

Originally Posted by Rochard

This shit gets better and better.

At 22:19 they are talking about Thermite. They didn't say they found thermite. They are saying instead that they found sulfur (which shouldn't be there even thought it's used in concrete), and sulfur is one of four chemcials found in Thermite.... Which is proof positive that someone MUST have used Thermite to take down the buildings.

I guess we'll have to set aside the fact that thermite is used to cut and weld steel, and they didn't have to do that when building a fucking skyscraper. Sheep. They used Thermite to cut every fucking piece of steel in the towers.