|
its six of one, half dozen of the other... by answering "yes" it's ok you then are saying its fine for the gov't to just walk into your house, but "no" means you have some kind of superior force field that only a piece of paper signed by a judge will let them in. either case, they would have come into your house whether you like it or not.
people wanted this guy caught by any means necessary, letting him go would have meant huge problems for Boston and everyone being on high alert for months to come. rather, they stepped up and found the guy and "Boston is safe yet again!"
was it completely legal? who knows, a superior judge may have issued a blanket warrant that you're not aware of to do this. I think what the Boston PD did was in the best interest of the public and glad no one got hurt or "accidentally shot" in the process.
America wanted to stand up to these terrorists and prove they will get them by any means necessary, and they did.
fact is you can have all these rights or you can be safe and criminals caught, you can't have both. there are to many (not all) stupid rules and laws in place that make it extremely difficult for law enforcement to do their job. people crying about having their bags searched in airports? TOUGH SHIT! if it was up to me, every fucking person would be searched and their bags so when I'm floating 33k feet in the air, I feel safe.
|