View Single Post
Old 04-20-2013, 09:58 AM  
PornoMonster
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,257
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake View Post
I'm not all that familiar with UK laws governing pornography however I'm a bit confused by this statement:

"...ATVOD found that G Spot Productions broke statutory rules in two ways ? by allowing trailers of explicit sex without age verification and by failing to place effective access controls with debit cards..."

So ATVOD is expending its limited resources going after legitimate paysite operators because of their promotional "trailers" when they could be utilizing those resources to go after much more egregious offenses such as the glut of tube sites posting full-length (stolen) videos.

Seriously, why go after a paysite operator with a couple dozen "trailers" in their tour when there's no shortage of tube sites posting hundreds of thousands of "full-length" videos? Seems that they could have a much greater impact using the same amount of resources if they went after the sites with vastly more content (and full-length at that) rather than going after a site with a couple dozen trailers. Anyone know if there's a particular reason why they chose to go after these particular sites? Someone running them piss off the wrong person?
Easy --
Websites have a business address.
Tubes -- an anonymous person uploaded it..

HAHAH Stupid, but that is spot on, with current laws.
PornoMonster is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote