View Single Post
Old 03-12-2013, 05:11 PM  
ReggieDurango
Confirmed User
 
ReggieDurango's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: California
Posts: 4,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by myjah View Post
Without reading the other responses, my gut response is that Parody films OWE a % of profit to the Parent media they spin off from and the Parody project should be contractually agreed upon.
Wrong.

The real issue here is that Smash didn't wait until Universal released THEIR movie of 50 Shades of Grey... then Smash would have had no problems releasing a "parody" of that movie. However, Universal bought the "film" rights to adapt the book, and Smash made a "film" based on the book, which, since the Universal movie hasn't come out yet, they are not allowed to do - so it's not a parody issue, it's a film rights issue.

Our movie SPUNK'D is clearly a parody, we never got sued, and if we ever DO get sued I don't think they would have much of a case against us. Check out the trailer and you decide:
SPUNK'D TRAILER

Last edited by ReggieDurango; 03-12-2013 at 05:24 PM.. Reason: Do you really think Saturday Night Live owes a % of their profits to the entities they are parodying?
ReggieDurango is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote