Quote:
Originally Posted by DWB
No it wasn't, but it played off the first one and they poorly built the characters for this one. The wicked witches were poorly cast and her green face was too smooth and she looked a little chubby. She wasn't scary and neither were the monkeys. They could have really done her up like the evil witches in the recent Hansel & Gretel movie.
Oz was OK, it tells how he came to be. How he came up with the "Wizard" was good, but the wicked witches... eh... not convincing characters. Glenda the good witch was well played. The landscape and story also wasn't vast like the original. They had BIG shoes to fill trying to spin off the original and I just don't think they filled them. They could have done it better, that's all.
|
From what I read and heard, Warner Bros own the rights to the "Wizard of Oz", so the studio that produced "Oz The Great And Powerful" had a pile of things they were not allowed to reproduce, from songs, to red shoes, to rainbows, etc., so they were not trying to redo the original - they decided to settle for a prequel.
Not arguing, just saying...