03-05-2013, 12:56 AM
|
|
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mallorca - Nottingham
Posts: 5,176
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Far-L
You guys all sound so tough when you are scoffing at obvious liabilities that could impact your businesses, regardless of there being any point of "right" or "wrong". Impressive. I guess your non- responses really told them where they could stick their heads in their lawyer's asses.
At the end of the day, when it comes right down to it, Mattel could stack your legal bills so high that it could seriously impact your business, even before it ever goes to trial, and knock most companies out of the game or seriously setback by the inevitable settlement. If they figure out you make enough to make it worth their while, then trust me, any non response is just going to make matters worse for you in the long run.
Just not worth the risk in my honest opinion. SDA should have known better after they already tried to tm it and got schooled. Now it looks like it was willful and they really stand to lose something if they have anything to lose. Anyone associated with it might also be screwed.
Great.
But all the big ass brass balls big nut ballers are here to pump a fist in the air and flip the bird to companies justifiably trying to protect their mark, just like so many of you would if it was your content, your copyright, your trademark.
|
That just about covers it all perfectly. 
__________________
See sig...
|
|
|