Originally Posted by Far-L

Totally missing the point. Those cases are not using a bunny for an adult property logo that is heavily trademarked, branded, and identifiable worldwide.

In the one case, Tori was allowed to use her former status as a Bunny which makes sense since she, as part of the magazine, is forever identifiable as part of the brand.

Also, the "landmark case" you claim was won in the first article - where do you get that? The ruling was merely a stage in the process and since then obviously branded keywords do have a lot more protection. While Playboy can't stop someone from selling "playmate" searches to the Igloo Playmate coolers, they can go after anyone using it to market adult properties.