Quote:
Originally posted by eroswebmaster
If you can prove he violated those you're fine, but you offer no proof, like I said you just made the accusation, found him guilty and meted out his punishment.
This once again would not, could not occur between vendors in the brick and mortar world without there being consequences on both ends.
|
Brick & Mortar scenario:
If I was fired from my job and not given a reason, my only option would be to sue my former employer for wrongful discharge.
My case would be brought to court, my employer would bring proof/reasons as to why I was fired, and a judge and jury would decided on whether or not I was wrongfully discharged.
Internet scenario:
Run was terminated from the program and not given a solid reason. His only option is to sue Spotbrokers. I'm not sure what the exact charge would be.
His case would be brought to court, Spotbrokers would bring proof of is cheating, and a judge and jury would decide whether or not he was actually cheating.
Tell me how these two scenarios are different.