|
I will say it just 1 more time.
I'm not on either side of this battle and have 0 vested interest except for how this business operates.
Not another business would think about accusing a vendor of "cheating," stop payment on checks and not expect to have to show proof.
If you pulled this in the brick and mortar world you'd have collection agencies on your ass, your credit could be ruined, and your ass taken to court, who knows maybe even criminal charges of fraud could be levied.
But when this occurs it always seems to occur to a webmaster who would be wise just to chalk it up as a loss or suffer the expenses of a long trip to America to fight a battle that could be strung out for a good long while.
A money program might win the financial battle, but it does not mean they would have necessarily proven their case in court.
I hate cheaters as much as anyone, but honestly I can't wait until some of these companies get checked in court on what is their standard operating procedure.
Sure cheaters deserve to be punished, but there has to be some procedures in place to make sure that neither side will abuse what we all value, and that is trust.
|