Originally Posted by bhutocracy

Nope, you pretty much just flamed out there. Evolution is a capital "F" Fact. It is a Fact that evolution occurs. There is no faith neccessary at all. What you are calling faith (and btw callously insulting those who have faith and believe faith in the devine is special) is the same thing as not walking off a tall building because you have "faith" that the theory of gravity will cause you to fall. Both falling from buildings and evolution are facts. The theory part is the mechanism involved, so while scientists may argue over punctuated equilibrium in evolution or the mechanism of gravity, they don't argue over the fact of evolution or that you fall off buildings.
If you want to change the meaning of words go ahead but it has no bearing on reality or the argument. To get to the larger point of accepting abiogenisis, as I mentioned in the previous post, they've already demonstrated how it occurs up to RNA. The "belief" required isn't the same kind or quality as wholesale belief in something completely untestable, Ie it's not blind. If you could prove god or an invisible unicorn the way we are proving that life originated here chemically than it wouldn't be blind faith in god and I would be withholding all judgement as the scientists got on with proving god. You're making a category error. Belief + fact != religion.