Quote:
Originally Posted by StickyGreen
The 2nd Amendment does not say "The right to form militias due to an absence of a federal army." lol
The right to form a militia is there because the militias would fight against the state military, should it be taken over in tyranny, they are not one in the same.
You can't rely on the army, marines, navy, etc if they are the ones oppressing you. Think. This is why you have the right to form militias in case this ever happens.
Seems like a lot of you need to study history more to understand how tyranny unfolds.
|
are you retarded? of course it doesn't say that. use some logic. why was this written? because at the time, there was no organized federal government for protection, because it has just been formed at the time with this document. the colonies were organizing themselves as one.
i think using hitler as an example for why a country should have guns is moronic. if you have a guy with hitler's agenda coming to power, i think you have bigger problems than guns