View Single Post
Old 11-18-2012, 03:50 AM  
Adraco
Confirmed User
 
Adraco's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Onboard an airplane around the globe
Posts: 3,737
They way I see it:

Cascade billing was invented and put in place to benefit the site owner, if the processor declined the sale.

Then processors must have seen a rise in their "lost sales" since declines moved elsewhere and thus didn't generate any money for the first processor who declined.

So that processor have to come up with a system to, for their own sake, business and revenue, "keep the sale" with them. So the cascade doesn't move on, at least not before they have had a chance to convert it themselves. So basically the "call in function" gives CCBill (in this case) a second chance to convert the sale and generate commission for themselves. Bot honestly, how many out of all the declines do call in?
__________________
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The truth is not affected by the beliefs, or doubts, of the majority.
Adraco is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote