|
They way I see it:
Cascade billing was invented and put in place to benefit the site owner, if the processor declined the sale.
Then processors must have seen a rise in their "lost sales" since declines moved elsewhere and thus didn't generate any money for the first processor who declined.
So that processor have to come up with a system to, for their own sake, business and revenue, "keep the sale" with them. So the cascade doesn't move on, at least not before they have had a chance to convert it themselves. So basically the "call in function" gives CCBill (in this case) a second chance to convert the sale and generate commission for themselves. Bot honestly, how many out of all the declines do call in?
__________________
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The truth is not affected by the beliefs, or doubts, of the majority.
|