Quote:
Originally Posted by Shotsie
And how exactly do you apply mathematical statistics to voter tendencies? Please demonstrate the mathematical equation that shows us which candidate a voter casts a ballot for. I'd love to see this. Again, if you can't understand that there are countless voting divisions in Philadelphia which are exclusively black and entirely politically homogeneous in voting Democrat, I don't know what to tell you.
|
IIRC about 90% of the black vote went towards Obama. A lot, for sure, but if you apply that as an average, then for every 10 black voters, you would expect 1 Romney vote. So if you take for instance a district or whatever of 19,605 voters, you'd expect about 1,960 Romney votes, not 0. In fact, let's say this is a ridiculously pro-Obama district where it's 99%. You'd still expect 196 votes for Romney. To the contrary would be a probability of .99 to the 19,605th power. If you want to get a calculator and put in .99 x .99 x .99 x .99...19,605 times, you'll see how statistically ridiculous that would be.
That said, the story could be full of shit, and/or a legitimate mistake happened, and/or it was fraud but both sides were doing it. Any of those to me seems a lot more likely than Obama stole the election and Romney was some kind of angel throughout the whole process.