Quote:
Originally Posted by epitome
So the numbers are a little off but things are still pretty much exactly what I said.
Next you're going to argue that the $23 billion Treasury is going to lose was the portion Obama gave them and not Bush.
|
No, but I would point out that 23 billion is more than 17 billion
I would also tell you that GM's production of cars in China went up 55% after the bailout. Wow, that's some oversight by the Obama Administration
"Obama lambastes GOP rival Mitt Romney for outsourcing, Government Motors is now planning to invest $1 billion over the next five years -- not in America, but in Russia. That's on top of $7 billion total in China, close to $1 billion in Mexico, and $600 million for a shirt sponsorship deal with Manchester United, the British soccer club."
Great how all that money that was suppose to be spent for shovel ready jobs worked out for the US isn't it
http://townhall.com/columnists/miche...out/page/full/
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that