Quote:
Originally Posted by SilentKnight
Perhaps the thinking of the day was after spending a few billion on the space program the public expected to see moon shots - and without photos everyone would question whether man actually walked on the moon.
So while they *did* walk on the moon, maybe the logistics of taking photos didn't work...so they faked them. That way...at least a large percentage of the population was satisfied.
Who's to say - of course it's all conjecture.
I believe man's walked on the moon...numerous times. But I also believe the official version isn't the same as what actually took place.
|
That's possible, after all the LRO images show "tracks" all over the place. However, even if the LRO images are not faked, they could have been made by unmanned rovers.
Nobody disputes unmanned missions, even the Soviets landed one or two rovers. But it seems the only evidence of man landing on the moon is the images and video. If you accept/believe they are faked, then there's no evidence man landed on the moon. So why believe it?