Quote:
Originally Posted by HTMwrestling
Wasn't it a bunch of BS biased studies that got Saccharin banned in the first place? It was only dangerous at utterly ridiculous doses and was nowhere's near as prolific.
|
Always depends where the funding for the studies comes from; when funded by those who profit from it we hear "It's lovely, couldn't be better"..."Radiation from Nuclear Power Melt Down's is Good For You" etc, whereas when it's independent not for profit studies, or a study from a University (with a non-conflict-of-interest source of funding) we hear "Toxic"..."Poison"..."Damages Health" etc.
