Quote:
Originally Posted by Grapesoda
hummmm..... errr.... Mike if a distributor will not accept 'condom porn' the production company should shoot it any way, pay the performers and not sell the product? is that your mighty thinking on this?
|
many of you guys arent really getting it....
it isnt whether or not a company should shoot it...its about they arent going to have a choice. Cloaking it in "performer rights" isnt going to go anywhere....if the election were today the condom law will pass with about 67% of the vote, that isnt likely to change...much anyway...its approval rating is higher than President Obamas.
the point people seem to be missing is that had we simply been condom optional all along this thing would not have befallen us. 2/3s of the talent dont wanna use condoms anyway so would you shoot one condom scene out of every three or four to prevent being required to shoot ALL condom.....thats the point....
In a purely political analysis there are some positives to the law passing....One Manwin will be hurt by it....big time. Two itll decimate APHSS and do serious damage to the FSC (which cant be damaged much more than it is)
little producers in more remote areas will benefit.....porn valley will become home of features and PPV, not gonzo....
and knock of the hatred of the fsc nonsense this has little to do with them other than they are spending a pile of Fabians money to fight this....
Chances are high that this measure will pass....be ready when it does...and mark my words...on the off chance it doesn't.....that will NOT be the end of it.