Quote:
Originally Posted by epitome
I've been disagreeing with you a lot lately but here I absolutely agree.
Serious affiliates are going to push a site if it sells. They're going to factor in that they aren't going to get paid by a few programs but they realize that all businesses suffer from loss and factor that into the equation.
If you rely on only CCBill sites you are leaving money on the table. If you lose the equivalent of 3 sales on top of 100 new sales because one of the NATS program that sells well goes bust, it is still nice to have those 97 extra sales.
|
Put another way... CCbill charges about double what Mutt would pay to run it himself, even paying for similar servicing, like sending checks, etc.
So, he would need over double the sales for it to equal affiliate income from non-ccbill affiliates. Does anyone really think it would be worth the extra time and expense and justifying the additional work one would have to do to support those affiliates - to acquire those affiliates, then motivate them, and finally solicit those sales? I personally think the time would be better spent finding affiliates that don't have ccbill only restrictions and paying them a bit of the juice you make on what you save not using ccbill.