Quote:
Originally Posted by RandyRandy
|
Everyone except VenusBlogger and Paul Markham may agree that "cams are doing well", as a genre, but the article implies it is easy to make lots of money by start a new cam site, or by register as a model of a cam site.
The article forgots to say that 95% of the new cam sites fail or struggle to just stay up. The article it also forgets it is required lots of money to launch a cam site (mostly due to advertising and fixed-pay promo for keep models there) it is not a bedroom operation you run as hobby.
The article implies that most USA girls can do lots money in cams. As example $40,000 per month models and "A recent cam show by Jenna Haze* on AWE's LiveJasmin.com attracted 10,000 paying followers. That's a lot of cash".
Possibly "10,000" it was the popunders opened, not the pay users, anyway we know a dozen models make $40,000 per month each, just other thousands make very less.
Should the article guy go in second and third page girls and ask how much they made per month and will find $200 to $800 per month really. Not as good for USA models or westerns in general (the Article implies the east europe models it is the past, and the future is USA girls, I quite see the opposite, was more USA girls before 2005...).
Finally the article it is a celebration of AWE's livejasmin, no wonder the tax people read such article and be in AWE's office immediately to ask their cut of the billion dollar market they claim they dominate, see:
https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1081209
Said that, the article it can be still interesting for who misses cam knowledge completely.