Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterPeabody
As we NYCers say: Um....yah....excuse me? Nevermind....
Then continue on our way....
You continue to push the same old crap JimmyCooper - but you should know better since you're also pushing Mia Magma.
So get your eyes uncrossed, eh?
|
I don't know. Maybe my eyes are fucked up. Take a look at these charts.
The one on the left indicates what the mobile redirect cpm by country was during the week I built the Mia Magma site back in February.
On the right is the est. prior month German/All Mobile/Local/Exact searches for the top 20 German babes. Both celebs and porn stars.
Now when you look at the chart on the left, is the
$71.75 flashing brightly in neon lights? Or do I need to get that shit checked out?
Seriously, though, I do agree that she's not very attractive, neither is Lena Nitro for that matter, but Gina Wild has been retired for several years, Sexy Cora is dead, and Vivian Schmitt is not only retired but is also heavily searched in other countries. I had also yet to do a celeb focused site at that time and bc Mia was fairly new to porn, I felt she'd see an increase in searches and she is at 9900 now.
With 10 German traffic targeted sites, it was definitely a fun and profitable bubble to ride out. It finally popped last month and my mobile redirect cpms tanked like a motherfucker. It hurt pretty bad, still kind of hurts, but I knew it was a bubble from the start and that the bubble would inevitably pop at some point. And had it not popped until a week later, I'd also still be on the hook for a beginner German class at The New School so whatever.
Quote:
Originally Posted by adultmobile
So you say the ignorant should not decide; but you also cna't get over the opposite side , so the art critic and galleries, where the above common porn picture get sold for $500,000 because its author, and eventually exposed in a museum.
This is because human brain and society it is made like that. For example why the nipple of Janet Jackson it is so much a bigger deal of the one of a random pornstar, it is still a same nipple. Why in isolated villages of not civilized countries the people go around naked and happy including under 18 children, and can not understand whats wrong with that... but at the same time, the nipple of Janet Jackson it is a big deal in the country who sent the man on the Moon and several robots on Mars?
I wished I can return ignorant, does all this studies and civilization is all useful?
Ok let me be not ignorant and cite http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benedetto_Croce
Who, already in 1901 so well before any modern art and without knowledge of psychology or Freud's work, "... claimed that art is more important than science or metaphysics, since only the former edifies us. He felt that all we know can be reduced to logical and imaginative knowledge. Art springs from the latter, making it at its heart, pure imagery. All thought is based in part on this, and it precedes all other thought. The task of an artist is then to put forth the perfect image that they can produce for their viewer, since this is what beauty fundamentally is – the formation of inward, mental images in their ideal state. Our intuition is the basis of forming these concepts within us."
The funny fact of the guy, it is he lists what it is NOT art, and that's a long list - most people think he's outdated and wrong, but well... honestly I think there's something that is is NOT art, whatever it is sold or advertised as art. Simply it should be the people naked in isolated village to decide it too, in my 2 cents opinion.
PS: Hellos to Amnon of met-art if he reads this ever  |
Speaking of Janet Jackson, I imagine that 'Nippelblitzer' (German for 'wardrobe malfunction' ) is probably one of the coolest words in any language in the world.