Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie
Do you really take that seriously? They are an AFFILIATE. Period.
Sometimes I have to wonder what some people are thinking. A lot of you act like marks and are always being worked. A few of you understand the game.
You are supposed to be IN this business. Anybody actually in this business who believes a "review site" is an actual "review site" like "Consumer Reports", is a mark. Plain and simple.
Whomever wrote those "reviews" is no more and no less qualified to "grade" a website than any asshole off the street. Most times they are LESS qualified because they aren't a fan of and don't understand the niche in front of them.
People, start acting like you are in this business and stop acting like fans/customers.
|
Of course it's hard to judge the quality of a porn site purely on a reviews site review. However, I'm happy with those score, in fact extremely happy.
Rabbit Reviews
Paul Markham Teens Quality 9/10 Total score 84/100 Content shot for magazines and to sell off a content store non exclusive.
MOFOS Quality 9/10 Total score 76/100 Content shot for the paysite and exclusive. A lot of it HD videos which we never bothered with as videos were a side line. Yet can't meet my
Brazzers Quality 10/10 Total score 95/100 Content shot for the paysite and exclusive. A lot of it HD videos which we never bothered with as videos were a side line.
So a guy whose main market was selling pictures to magazines and a content store to sell non exclusive to people who were then more interested in price than quality. Is getting comparable scores with Manwin's sites. What's bad about that?