View Single Post
Old 08-16-2012, 02:42 PM  
Connor
Confirmed User
 
Connor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,294
Manwin vs ICM Registry and .XXX

After all the years I spent fighting .XXX, it's kind of fun to be on the sidelines now watching Manwin at work.

This is, without a doubt, my favorite paragraph in some time:

"At the very least, the misrepresentation of support from adult entertainment companies, the generation of fake comments in support of .XXX, the submission of misleadingly edited videos and photos, the non-disclosure that certain celebrity adult entertainment supporters of .XXX were paid by ICM, and the creation of a supposedly independent sponsoring entity [the International Foundation for Online Responsibility ? ed.] that was in fact controlled by ICM, are sufficient allegations to establish improper, anticompetitive conduct? under existing case law, Gutierrez wrote."

http://www.ynot.com/content/118136-m...icm-icann.html

I sooooo hope that Manwin finds a way to pry out of lock up those "letters of support" that we've all heard that ICM sent to ICANN.... I would looovveeeee to see once and for all who sent those.
Connor is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote