View Single Post
Old 08-05-2012, 12:40 PM  
Confined
Registered User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 93
They also had cannons and multi shot hand cannons back then too.

You can destroy a building with a cannon.

But I digress... regardless, the framers main purpose of even having the 2nd was not to quibble about what it applies to.

It was meant to keep people free by not allowing anybody to oppress them.

There will always be fucked up individuals in any society.

Quote:
Originally Posted by J. Falcon View Post
It's only natural for responsible people to try and find a solution to the gun problem. Unfortunately, most people feel threatened when the issue is brought up, and they bring up all kinds of ridiculous points to defend their right to carry fire arms.


The 2nd amendment was written in 1791. The only firearms of the day were black powder muskets and one shot pistols. The framers and country folk of the Constitution had no concept of AR-15s, AK 47s, uzies and the like.

Assault rifles were intended to be military anti-personnel weapons. How is it possible for these weapons to be owned by the civilian population for non-military use?

Last edited by Confined; 08-05-2012 at 12:42 PM..
Confined is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote