The word 'missing' is from the YouTube video title. If that video is made up (e.g actors, altered speech) then it's caught me out, because it looks legit to me.
Fair enough about the domainer thing if that's why you were asking
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brujah
Not exactly, it's more interesting to me that you aren't forthcoming with your sources. That's very revealing about you and your choice of sources. Why would I have confidence if someone isn't confident enough themselves to share their source?
Add to that the misleading deceptive title you chose to use, but I understand it was just copied from your source.
Then the Bloomberg article you found and posted, which doesn't have the word "missing" anywhere in the article.
These are just a few things that point to you being an unreliable person to get information from, if I were interested in accuracy.
Still, I'm primarily a domainer and I have a bunch of domain names related to conspiracy and religion topics. I'm always interested in sources to help develop them.
|