Quote:
Originally Posted by Avalana
isn't it about having both with an excellent quality?
|
Absolutely. The problem for most is they can't afford the investment in buying or creating quality content and I'm not talking about buy a HD camera. That's the easy part.
There are very few people with the knowledge to create great content and they tend to want more for their labour than the other guys. Madalton has shot some great stuff recently and will tell you it costs more than what most people will spend, same goes for Orgasms.xxx, babe.com whengirlsplay, Met-art, X-art, Viv Thomas, Steve Hicks, Evil Angel, Vivid and a host of others. Still a small slice of the market.
Traffic on the other hand is mostly paid for after the sign up and money received.
So what works best? doing something 100s can do and something 10s can do?
Then there's the question of the surfer. Often he clicks on a link after seeing a sample, he then goes through the tour and is turned on or off by what he sees. Then those that spend their money get into the members area and do they take what's there for a month and leave or stay longer?
Can a site with crap conversions and retention attract great traffic?
Then there's the question of where do people send their traffic, to a site that converts well and one that doesn't?
Those who are now going to tell us you have to have the traffic for people to see it can answer the last one. I'm sure that will make a few of them stumble, but not many.