Quote:
Originally Posted by Brujah
Why do you select the doomsday scenario when it's less than half of the possible scenarios presented in the original document. It actually has a lot of great scenarios that improve life on a global scale for everyone, without any central bankers or super elite being part of it. Is it because you want to censor those for the reader, because it doesn't support your pro-doomsday stance?
http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org...eb007cc719.pdf |
Do keep in mind that the Rockefeller's are the Central Bankers. They can select whichever one they want, possibly a combination of scenarios. It's about shaping the world into one which benefits them, unfortunately what benefits them normally has the opposite effect on us. Remember these are the same people who funded both World Wars, they are the shapers, they stop at nothing to get what they want.