Quote:
Originally Posted by bigluv
I may as well spend my time talking to a brick wall.
|
Right, because I haven't been saying the same thing for YEARS.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigluv
Since you keep chanting the mantra of 'where is the real evidence', then please tell us what would be "real evidence" from your perspective? And how would anyone not on the inside go about collecting it? Oh, it's not feasible? Welcome to the real world where we have to go with "on the balance of probabilities" rather than "more certain than the type of proof the scientists for the higgs boson have presented".
|
Are you fucking with me?
I'd said it at least 100 times over the past four years,
record it.
It worked for LiveReviews.com, why can't it work for someone else? Or have them do it. Perhaps they would take on just one more review for shits and giggles.
Again,
and I will make this red so you will have to pay attention to it,
I am not saying it is or is not happening. I'm saying prove it. And I've repeatedly said how.
But please, just ignore all of that and say I support whatever company fits your need and that talking to me is like talking to a brick wall.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigluv
Just FYI, you aren't doing Tam's case any good. You have a technical point about the evidence, but its pedantic and useless. You blathering on reinforces the point that, the only person who could come to the conclusion that MR and Tam are not dirty is someone who is as determined as you are to come down on that side of the argument. What that means is, you are actually hurting her shreds of credibility with your hair splitting. So, congrats.
|
"hurting her credibility"
She has a new job already. Guess the trolls lose again. Shucks. And I'm sure her new employer was hanging on every word I said before they made their final decision to hire her.
Seriously, some of you guys are funny fuckers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigluv
PS. Your argument would also apply to Chris Mallick btw. So apparently in DWBland he's innocent too.
|
I do not agree with your hidden anonymous viewpoint of Tam, or agree with your definition of evidence, therefor I must also think Chris Mallick did not steal ePass money.
Great logic there.
Now I understand why you are posting anonymously.