Quote:
Originally Posted by DWB
The only thing I've said repeatedly is that I'd like to see real evidence of whatever they are being accused of. I've been asking for this for four years every since all of this drama publicly started.
|
We won't have a meeting of the minds so I'm not going to debate you on your response. I may as well spend my time talking to a brick wall.
Since you keep chanting the mantra of 'where is the real evidence', then please tell us what would be "real evidence" from your perspective? And how would anyone not on the inside go about collecting it? Oh, it's not feasible? Welcome to the real world where we have to go with "on the balance of probabilities" rather than "more certain than the type of proof the scientists for the higgs boson have presented".
Just FYI, you aren't doing Tam's case any good. You have a technical point about the evidence, but its pedantic and useless. You blathering on reinforces the point that, the only person who could come to the conclusion that MR and Tam are not dirty is someone who is as determined as you are to come down on that side of the argument. What that means is, you are actually hurting her shreds of credibility with your hair splitting. So, congrats.
PS. Your argument would also apply to Chris Mallick btw. So apparently in DWBland he's innocent too.