View Single Post
Old 07-22-2012, 10:53 AM  
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by slapass View Post
It would if they did. They did not. This was pretty provable with the evidence. It was a bad serve on the warrant, not a loack of proof of wrong doing.
btw if it was just a bad serve on a warrent and all the previously collected evidence proved they were guilty

all the government would have to do is drop the current charges, and re issue a new warrant


it a lot more than that.

from the jurisdictional issue that means they should even have a right to charge them

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/201...suit-you.shtml


to the 50,000 legitimate users who had their property taken

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/201...al-files.shtml

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/201...-content.shtml

to the hundreds of artist who have come forward because they used mega upload for self promotion/payment.



to the use of civil liability of inducement as a justification for criminal prosecution even though there is no criminal liability for inducement.

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/201...ismiss.shtml:(

to the illegal warrant

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/201...-illegal.shtml
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

Last edited by gideongallery; 07-22-2012 at 11:00 AM..
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote