Quote:
Originally Posted by Nembrionic
Strange statement. Nobody circumcises their kids to prevent STDs. Some studies show people might have a lesser change on HIV and such but that's not a generally accepted thing.
Both operations require bodily harm? A vaccin is considered bodily harm? A vaccine is pretty much vital. Circumcision isn't.
If you can't differentiate between something as vital as FEEDING and cutting off a bit of skin you really should get of the internet.
How on earth can you compare a necessity as feeding to something frivolous as getting cut? That's why I think you're being stupid. Consider thát an insult.
Saying that it's okay for parents to decide to cut off a bit of your body is a bit silly, don't you think?
|
I left out the boring parts but it seems to me that you're just ignorant of the facts.
Both the World Health Organization(WHO) and the Center for Disease Control (CDC) recognize that circumcision does protect against STDs. So your whole 'not a generally accepted thing' statement is horrible.
Second of all vaccines aren't vital - people can live a long life without ever being vaccinated. Do you think it is okay to bore a hole through your child's skin and inject them with a foreign substance against their will? That's what you're making circumcision sound like. Saying it is okay for your parents to decide to bore a hole in your skin and inject you with a weakened virus must sound 'a bit silly' to you, I think.