Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSquealer
You idiots and your "wisdom" could make the same argument and argue that chickens create jobs, not entrepreneurs because people eat chicken. You could apply that sort of juvenile and idiotic backwards reasoning to anything.
That doesn't change the fact that nothing would have happened without the businessman that stepped in, spotted opportunity, understood the odds were against him of succeeding, risked his capital, his time, his energy and sweated blood into a startup to make it work.
When you reduce his incentive to do so, he will do it less. Pretty simple for any actual businessman and entrepreneur to understand. Probably not so easy for a child who cant understand why the world owes him a living but doesn't provide one for him.
|
Of course its simple but the whole scenario doesn't even exist unless there is someone out there to buy the products. putting the tax burden solely on the average shitbag also reduces incentive for the businessman as consumerism is reduced more and more. what would the entrepreneur do if no one could afford their products?