Quote:
Originally Posted by Fetish Gimp
And the evidence that this happened is where exactly? Because that's what's needed. You can speculate all you want, it means sweet fuck all if there's no evidence to support it.
Exactly. You know those words pesky little words that judges instruct the jury to remember, "beyond a reasonable doubt"?
Read your own words and let it sink in.
|
That is the whole point. I don't know what happened. I am only speculating. You don't know either. We know a few things, but most of it is a mystery.
I have no evidence that Zimmerman chased Trayvon down and tried to detain him. But then again, there is no evidence that this didn't happen.
None of us know for sure. All I am saying is that that while there is evidence supporting his claim that he was attacked, he still shot an unarmed kid and that is not good for him. Logic tells me that it is more likely that he pursed the kid and instigated the confrontation than the other way around, but I don't know that.