Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
By that time the damage had already been done.
You keep going back to the fire saying "the fire wasn't enough". It wasn't. It was a combination of the impact damage, the fire, and the stress put on the remaining support. It failed.
|
Regardless, this would not have compromised the entirety of the structure.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
Don't you think if there was one shred of evidence that the truth was otherwise the press would have jumped all over it? It would have been the story of all times.
|
No, the press were embarassingly pro-administration after the event. For corroboration look up Dan Rather, Daniel Ellsberg, Karen Kwiatkowski, and so on...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
And yet still not one person has come forward saying "I helped do it".
|
It HAS only been a decade. It took a long time for the JFK killers to come forth. And there have been people who have come out about involvement in the 9/11 attack - they just haven't been covered by the mainstream media...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
But I have not found on bit of evidence that proves to me it went down any other way than we were told.
|
You've simply not done enough inquiring....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
Common sense should tell you that a huge plane with tens of thousands of gallons of jet fuel hit a building at nearly six hundred miles per hour, and as expected the building caught fire and fell.
|
Common sense would expect that the building would catch fire. Not that it would fall.
:D