Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
This is one of the things I don't get.
Let's just say the US Government - or any other organization - wanted to take down the towers using explosives such as Mediaguy claims. Why wouldn't just light a simple fire to get the bulk of the people to leave and then just blow it? Why all the planes and such nonsense?
Another thing that doens't make sense in their claims.
|
That is something to consider.
However consider also how dramatic and pervasive the iconic imagery of the burning towers has become.
Consider how much the "attack" contributed to George W. Bush's presidency, and the so-called war in the middle east and the whole 'War on Terror".
The falling and imploded towers gave new life to Rudy Guilianni's career, and were used by all the war hawks to illustrate their ambitions, but WTC7 was not - in fact most people didn't even know about it, a prominent New York judge actually said "World Trade Center What?". and many still don't know about it.
That's because the towers were "useful" and tv-friendly, but not WTC7.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
Everyone saw the plane hit the fucking towers, and the resulting fire.
Done.
|
Right. And anyone involved will tell you they were designed to take planes hitting "the fucking towers".
Has anyone explained why they fell?
No.
Even NIST claimed they couldn't explain it, and their report describes everything that occurred prior to collapse, without going into why or how...
:D