Quote:
Originally Posted by epitome
Trying to find the posts on GFY from '04 where you were saying the same about Bush because there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq...
|
I'm not going to dig through threads from eight years ago, but in 2008 I was saying the only significant thing Bush did in two terms was to invade Iraq and Afghanistan. I also said of McCain's choice of running mate "Palin?! Fucking Palin?! What the fuck?"
More recently, you'll see numerous threads in which I've asked "when republicans can so readily admit that Bush sucked, why can't dems see that Obama was also a bad pick?"
I've pointed out numerous times that unemployment under Bush was not stellar. Averaging 5.3% and peaking at 7.3% in December 2008, those numbers kind if suck. What I don't understand is some people's inability to admit that 9.4%, Obama's average, sucks even much worse. There are almost twice as many people out of work, so why can't we look at these plain numbers and say what they mean - Bush sucked, and Obama sucked almost twice
as bad.
James Dyson could name his next product after either one of them.